This morning began like most mornings: kettle humming, toast popping, and the little domestic rituals that make up the scaffolding of a life. Outside, someone in the building below banged a door a little too hard. My neighbor’s radio leaked a half-forgotten song into the hallway. Charlie, my corgi, circled the kitchen island with the earnestness of a small diplomat negotiating crumbs.
And then my brain, as it so often does, wandered to the big things. Life. Death. The thin, strange line we put between them with our daily routines. It is odd how the mind can hold a grocery list and a cosmic question at once. I found myself sipping tea and thinking about mortality as if it were a spice added to breakfast, a bitter note that somehow made the rest taste clearer.
We dress our days in small, repetitive armor: emails, errands, the polite nods and small talk. Those are the things that keep us moving, like gears in a clock. But behind the gears is an escape hatch we rarely open, the knowledge that everything is temporary. When you let that knowledge in for even a minute, it reorganizes priorities without ceremony. A traffic jam becomes a meditation; a stranger’s smile becomes a tiny miracle.
And yet, people spend so much of their precious, finite time squabbling. Not over life plans or grand betrayals, but over the small, hot coals of ego and habit. Who left a mess in the shared kitchen? Who has the audacity to prefer a different brand? Whose parking spot is more valid? The list reads like a comedy of manners, except sometimes the stakes are real enough to leave bruises.
I watched a brief exchange on social media this afternoon. Two people, formerly civil acquaintances, dismantled each other sentence by sentence over a misremembered detail in a public post. The comments grew like kudzu, fast and messy, a tangle of assumptions. It was petty and magnetic, the way watching a slow-motion fender-bender can be. I felt both repulsed and acutely aware that I too have been an eager participant in that very theater. The admission made me uncomfortable in an honest, useful way.
Why do we get pulled into these small wars? Maybe because they are manageable. Big questions about purpose, death, forgiveness are enormous and slippery; they require vulnerability. Trivial battles are concrete; you can aim, score, and finish them. They give an immediate, if shallow, feeling of control. There is also the drug of attention. Outrage wins eyeballs, and attention feels like validation. But validation bought with friction tends to be hollow.
On my walk later I saw an elderly man feeding pigeons. He moved with deliberate slowness, each seed tossed like soft currency. Two teenagers passed, arguing about a video game, loud and earnest. The old man caught the tail end of their argument and smiled in a way that had no judgment in it. For a moment he became a bridge between small and large, as if to say: both matters. Both do not. Life insists on this simultaneity.
That afternoon a friend called. They were kind and thinly tired, their voice pulled taut with some petty workplace grievance. I listened without offering the solution they expected. Instead I asked them what they had eaten for lunch and whether they had taken a walk. The call shifted. They laughed, briefly, at how their anger had softened when we moved the conversation to something small but human. It was a quiet reminder: sometimes changing the frame around an irritation is all that is needed to stop a minor spark from becoming an inferno.
Thinking about death is not morbid for me. It is practical. It sharpens the lens. If today could be the only day, what would I do with it? Answer honestly: call my family and friends, pet Charlie until he whines, clear that email that has been a passive cloud. Most of the answers are mundane, embarrassingly so. Perhaps that is the point. The apparently trivial, a phone call, a thank-you, a quiet meal, compounds into the only things that last. Stories, warmth, the way someone pronounced your name once when you were not listening properly.
There is tenderness hidden in the ordinary. I found it in the way my neighbor apologized later for the slammed door. I found it in the barista who remembered the exact way I like my coffee. I found it in a random text from someone I had not spoken to in months: “Saw something that reminded me of you.” The message was small, but it landed like a coin in a fountain. You drop it in and make a wish, and sometimes, unpredictably, the wish is returned.
I am not advocating for a life free of conflict or for pretending that all arguments are worthless. Disagreements can be a brave form of honesty. They can peel back layers of complacency. But there is wisdom in choosing which battles deserve the cost, the emotional expenditure of time, the relationships strained, the sleepless nights. Pick the meaningful ones. Let the rest be water off the back of a tired duck.
As evening folded in, I stood at the window and watched the city inhale and exhale: lights blinking on in apartments, an old television glow through a curtain, a couple arguing in an otherwise silent car and then, minutes later, sharing a cigarette. The world is full of both weighty and ridiculous things. They coexist like winter and spring flowers, one comes with an end in mind, the other insists on blooming anyway.
If today taught me anything, it is this: pause before pouring your energy into a trivial scuffle. Ask whether the victory will echo tomorrow. If you must fight, make it for what you would miss in your last hour. And between the fights, feed the pigeons. Say the small, true things. Laugh when you can. Hold hands when you must. Life, stubborn and brief, prefers to be lived in those unapologetically ordinary moments.